Sarah’s fingertips hummed against the cold glass of the heirloom cabinet at exactly 11:08 PM. It was a phantom vibration, the kind you feel when you have spent too long staring at something that is not supposed to move. Inside, the Limoges rabbit sat perched on a tiny porcelain cabbage, its ears forever alert to a sound that never came. Her grandmother had bought it in 1998, and since then, it had traveled through three different houses, wrapped in 48 layers of acid-free tissue paper, only to be placed behind this barrier of silica and wood. It was perfect. It was pristine. It was, for all intents and purposes, dead. She felt a sudden, sharp pang of resentment toward the object, which is a terrible thing to feel toward a piece of hand-painted French art. But the rabbit demanded a specific kind of labor-the invisible, exhausting labor of non-interaction.
We have been taught that to care for something beautiful is to protect it from the world, but this is a lie that grows heavier with every passing decade. Preservation is often just a polite word for incarceration. When we lock these objects away, we aren’t saving them for the future; we are mourning them in the present. I found myself thinking about this today while recovering from a fit of sneezing-8 times in a row, which left my head spinning like a 28-rpm record. That sudden, violent movement of